It fits to stand out here, another important point argued by the authors who are the meanings of very used expressions for the professors, but that they are unaware of the meaning, becoming thus utopian speeches as historical procedure, method or didactic boarding, didactic, material techniques of education, resources and strategies of education. All these are indispensable actions for the process, but it has different meanings and take care of the distinct perspectives which the professor must adjust to each situation in the process teach-learning. In this perspective, they are placed in quarrel some boarding or the main methods and/or ways to teach, the example, skillful, dialogued and construtivista boarding. Danny Meyer has similar goals. The authors explicitam each one of them pointing its differences, positive and negative points (advantages and disadvantages) next to different situations inside of the classroom. Finally, she is pointed the relation between method and education of History. They are pointed as possible methods the inductive one, the indications and the inquiry as bridges that bind the pupil to the historical knowledge. Such methods place the pupil in the condition of active citizen that interacts exactly on the study object, assimilating and accomodating itself so that the learning happens. With the objective of taking in them to reflect on such methods, suggestions of plans are given of lessons for the last series of Basic Ensino, folloied of activities and it analyzes about the education of disciplines History. In the third text, Education of History: beddings and methods Bittencourt Maria, foca its quarrel on History in the current curricular proposals standing out the importance of if analyzing the processes of changes throughout the time and as currently ' occurs; ' the election cultural' ' of the knowledge considered essential for the pupils. It is important to remember that the curricular renewals in the decade of 90 of century XX were not a national phenomenon.