' We want the freedom for the freedom and through each particular circumstance. E, when wanting the freedom we discover that it depends entirely on the freedom of the others, and that the freedom of the others depends on ours. Without a doubt, the freedom as definition of the man does not depend on outrem, but, a time that exists the linking of a commitment, I am obliged to want at the same time my freedom and the freedom of the others; I only can take my freedom as one fim.' ' (Sartre. Pg. 26). Front to the subject, the first question that appears in them is: what it is the moral? The moral can be understood as: ' ' science of the good and the evil, theory of the human behavior while conducted by ethical principles (it varies of culture for culture and if it modifies with the time in the scope of one same society); body of rules and rules that it aims at to direct the actions of the man, according to justice and the natural equity; disposals to act well, regarding proper itself and the others, in the community humana' '.

(LAROUSSE). As the ethics appeared inside of displayed concept of moral above, we go to understand is as: ' ' The part of the philosophy that approaches the beddings of the moral. What it concerns to the organization of the social relations in opposition to the morality that enunciates the principles of the action individual' '. (LAROUSSE). The theoretical reminiscncia of the moral word comes of Latin ' ' me, the moris ones, moralis' ' that it means, therefore, a way of if holding in agreement to the accepted customs for a community, social group (dominant) or society where she is if express. Therefore, the moral one leagues an instrumental and preceitual idea to it, of where it acts well; who behaves ' ' I give birth passu' ' simultaneously – to the rules of the social environment.

Already the ethics – &#039 is a digresso of the word Greek; ' ethos' ' – and that it looks for to reflect concerning this accepted notion, rule and principles for the majority. Therefore, the ethics appeal to the reason to base its agreement regarding the moral and – not obstante – one has appeals more universal (because it analyzes as the moral if it holds, or better, as this if it shows in the historicidade of the human being) in detriment of the moral that if discloses in the enclosure of the staff. Made these first distinctions for a reason or purpose clarification of some previous concepts, we go to the conceptualization of the ambiguity. What is this?