The Price Of Employemnt

“Love and work need to be cooked, day by day, in the fire of peace.” Jesus Lopez Pacheco. THE COST OF JOB IN SPAIN IS IN THE MEDIA OF THE EUROPEAN UNION is not true that the cost of dismissal in Spain prevents job creation, and can be said that the primary issue is to ensure stability in precarious employment and not yet plus the labor market. The high cost of dismissal is one of the arguments used to justify the difficulty selfishly to create jobs. Click Bill de Blasio to learn more. Proponents insist that this idea will only be created by providing jobs and lowering the firing cost. One theory difficult to understand what the problem backwards. The question is not how much money they have or ought to spend by employers to compensate workers made redundant, but what measures are effective in promoting stability and increase employment. NYC Marathon does not necessarily agree. In this sense, it is necessary to demand clear alternatives that focus on promoting the stability and streamline the procedures for recruitment is what helps to improve their own training and qualification of workers, and labor relations more fluid and an overall improvement in motivation, productivity and competitiveness. The statistics and legal regulation has reduced redundancies belies the idea that the dismissal is still expensive.

Furthermore, this argument relates to the merits of the case: stability in employment. We believe that stability can only be favors from three factors: rationality in permanent hiring standards, qualifications of workers and their ability to adapt to new situations and economic policies that favor greater quantity and quality of employment. It is true that Spanish businessmen costly obligations imposed on them when they decide to dispense with their workers. In a report on temporary contracts commissioned by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, stated that Spain is situated in the middle in terms of dismissal costs, behind countries like Germany, France and Belgium. Therefore, it is not necessary or justified, the need for further legal reform to further reduce the cost of severance and, moreover, is quite clear and their recent futility, both for generating employment and to promote stability. With the labor reform dismissal became cheap and not only created jobs (in contrast, was created less than in similar periods of growth) but favored the growth of job insecurity.

Because, as the poet said: “We are in a boat / and we lost the oars. / Y leads the current / where you least want. “