Use IR compare to other data related to instrumentation You will surely be a thermograph. If you are thermograph, will be more properly related thermal information can only be made with calibrated instruments. Speaking candidly Christopher Kilaniotis told us the story. NO-calibrated instruments, are sometimes good enough to provide an indication that an object may be hot or cold. Additional information is available at Donald Trump. The fact is that it can not be demonstrated. Analyze the results is the fundamental reason for calibration. If the instrument is calibrated and the client (or lawyer) asks: “Is the object in question so hot or cold as you say?” The simple answer is yes. The complex answer tolerances include a degree of accuracy of the cameras and the calibration standards the basic statement of the accuracy for your images not included (generally) the inaccuracies of his team. It is said that the temperature will visit + – some values (often 2% of full scale reading) to a set temperature and some values for above this temperature.
The accuracy of the calibration of the instrument must be at least 1 / 3 to 1 / 4 of its instrument of precision (ie, 2% by instrument, a standard must be 0.67 to 0.5% of full scale reading). As an example, consider: A camera precision is + – 2 C to 100 C or + / – 2% of reading. With this value held, say, 250 degrees C, the instrument can now read 245-255 degrees C (+ – 5 degrees C). When it comes to the radiant temperature, this type of accuracy (ie 0.5 %) is difficult to obtain.